Comments on: Review: Rule 34, by Charles Stross http://functionalnerds.com/2012/01/review-rule-34-by-charles-stross/ Wed, 23 May 2012 14:06:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: ganymeder http://functionalnerds.com/2012/01/review-rule-34-by-charles-stross/comment-page-1/#comment-13429 ganymeder Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:05:07 +0000 http://functionalnerds.com/?p=2844#comment-13429 I hadn't heard of this before, but your review certainly makes it sound interesting! I hadn’t heard of this before, but your review certainly makes it sound interesting!

]]> By: SF Tidbits for 1/19/12 - SF Signal – A Speculative Fiction Blog http://functionalnerds.com/2012/01/review-rule-34-by-charles-stross/comment-page-1/#comment-13408 SF Tidbits for 1/19/12 - SF Signal – A Speculative Fiction Blog Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:06:17 +0000 http://functionalnerds.com/?p=2844#comment-13408 [...] Functional Nerds (Andrew Liptak) on Rule 34 by Charles Stross. [...] [...] Functional Nerds (Andrew Liptak) on Rule 34 by Charles Stross. [...]

]]> By: Andrew Liptak http://functionalnerds.com/2012/01/review-rule-34-by-charles-stross/comment-page-1/#comment-13405 Andrew Liptak Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:46:51 +0000 http://functionalnerds.com/?p=2844#comment-13405 Speculatively, I suspect that it could have been pulled off, but 2nd Person worked very well for this story, and I don't know if it would have been as effective. Speculatively, I suspect that it could have been pulled off, but 2nd Person worked very well for this story, and I don’t know if it would have been as effective.

]]> By: Paul (@princejvstin) http://functionalnerds.com/2012/01/review-rule-34-by-charles-stross/comment-page-1/#comment-13404 Paul (@princejvstin) Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:40:18 +0000 http://functionalnerds.com/?p=2844#comment-13404 Thanks, Andrew. The odd use of tense has caused me to be hesitant to pick up the book. From the outside, it looks offputting, or worse, a gimmick. You seem to imply a standard 3rd person limited or 1st person head jumping would not work as well? Thanks, Andrew.

The odd use of tense has caused me to be hesitant to pick up the book. From the outside, it looks offputting, or worse, a gimmick. You seem to imply a standard 3rd person limited or 1st person head jumping would not work as well?

]]>